The Paris Journalon AI & Digital Ethics
The Paris Journal is the official scientific journal of the Paris Conference on AI & Digital Ethics. It is an open-source peer-reviewed academic venue that contains all the articles presented at the Paris Conference on AI & Digital Ethics. More than just conference’s proceedings, it is a new kind of scientific journals, which combines efficiency (publishing important work within 6 months following their submission), rigour (combining several steps of blind reviews and resulting in a drastic selection with a 10% acceptance rate (2026)), and ethics (compensating reviewers for their work).
Editorial Committee of the 2026 edition
Dr. Thomas Souverain, Editor-in-Chief, Scientific Chair of the Paris Conference (CEA Paris-Saclay)
Dr. Hubert Etienne, Chairman of the Paris Conference (Quintessence AI)
Prof. Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Thematic Chair (Baylor College of Medicine)
Prof. Matthias Scheutz, Thematic Chair (Tufts University)
Dr. Antonin Bergeaud, Thematic Chair (HEC Paris)
Dr. Sasha Luccioni, Thematic Chair (Sustainable AI Group)
Published articles
Issue 2 (2026)
- A Climate Fix? Promotional Discourse on Artificial Intelligence and the Environment Before and After ChatGPTDOI 10.65701/67cukrb3xp
- AI and Digital Ethics in Healthcare: Emerging IssuesDOI 10.65701/iny56lt7bc
- AI, Democracy and Environmental Justice in AfricaDOI 10.65701/zasvrto7he
- Are we going towards Human-AI Coevolution? A multi-leveled framework to study the impact of human-AI interaction on societal behaviorsDOI 10.65701/1pkk7ohfda
- Children’s Rights, Metacognition, and AI Literacy: A Conceptual FrameworkDOI 10.65701/mul716qtfm
- Environmental Impacts of Data Centers and Criminal Law Responses: A Comparative PerspectiveDOI 10.65701/szoyc8w68z
- Epistemically-Aware AI: Toward a Bayesian Framework for Human-AI ComplementarityDOI 10.65701/z1sboejj37
- From Extraction to Exchange: A Data Streaming Framework for Equitable AI Content EconomicsDOI 10.65701/ofnfa9f1pb
- From Fear to Fluency: Cultivating AI Confidence and Socio-Economic Wellbeing in the WorkforceDOI 10.65701/jqcdpxr09o
- Generative AI as a Third Agent: Rethinking Academic Work and Principal-Agent Dynamics in Higher EducationDOI 10.65701/3mar80ih4s
- Hybrid Intention and Augmented Agency: Allocation of Criminal Culpability in Neuroprosthetic ControlDOI 10.65701/tk3x4lamdy
- Measuring AI Accountability Through Argumentation Analysis: Can Model Reasoning Withstand Scrutiny?DOI 10.65701/kl7do0n9re
- Moral Competence Before Moral Content: Why LLM Agents Lack the Prerequisites for Coherent AlignmentDOI 10.65701/1zidk02aqx
- Reconfiguring Creative Labour: Generative AI, Work Practice, and the Ethics of Distributed AgencyDOI 10.65701/4cks0bzk1b
- Regulating the Unseen: AI Accountability in UK Healthcare SectorDOI 10.65701/bwyy2jqr9w
- Socioaffective Ecosystems Beyond Risk Management: Two Conceptual Mismatches in AI CompanionshipDOI 10.65701/vcpsk3t5dl
- The Fabricated Front: Generative AI and the Opacity of Workplace PerformanceDOI 10.65701/aveczgy7jn
- The Social Lure of Generative AIDOI 10.65701/f5dnoxa0qv
- To What End? “Neurodata” Boundaries and Their Implications for Policy and RegulationDOI 10.65701/44lv1zerdb
- Toward a Self Organizing Literature Review: An Application to the Financial Impacts of Physical Climate RisksDOI 10.65701/edrswwwgnw
Issue 1 (2025)
- A Socioinformatic Analysis of Community-based Fact-Checking: Why Community Notes is Not as Effective as X ClaimsDOI 10.65701/k1q7n3p8t0
- AI as Bureaucracy: The Standardisation of JudgmentDOI 10.65701/z4t0k6c1p9
- AI with Heart: A Joy-Centered Framework for Ethical AI Development & ImplementationDOI 10.65701/x5v0c2z9m1
- AI, Digital Democracy, and the Crisis of Social Cohesion: Rebuilding Political TrustDOI 10.65701/r1v5t9c2k7
- Accountability and Attribution in AI Generated Content Authentication: Lessons from China’s AI Content Labelling MandateDOI 10.65701/q9m2g5d8x1
- Bootstrapping Trust across Web2 and Web3 Domains Using Publicly Verifiable Web DataDOI 10.65701/t0z4p7m2j8
- Building Trust and Developing Value between Creative Rightsholders and GenAI through Tokenised Licensing and Content Authenticity ToolsDOI 10.65701/j7d2m0q9t5
- Critical Thinking and Media Literacy in Youth from Underserved Contexts: Evidence from a Field InterventionDOI 10.65701/0k9v3m7q1p
- Digital Curtains Descending: Measuring and Comparing Legal Closure over Digital Spheres after TikTok v. GarlandDOI 10.65701/g2t6r9x4b1
- From Black Box to Glass Box: Leveraging Blockchain to Audit AI Systems Through Multistakeholder ParticipationDOI 10.65701/m4qf7v2k1n
- From Disinformation Dissection to Ideological ConflationDOI 10.65701/ax7n2_5j0d
- Gaming the System: Extremist Infiltration Strategies in MMORPGs and the MetaverseDOI 10.65701/n5p1z8c3v0
- Introduction to the Track on Countering Information Manipulation TechniquesDOI 10.65701/u2j7m0c9r4
- Rebuilding Social Cohesion: AI & The Faces of TrustDOI 10.65701/d8n2q0x7m3
- Speech Act Gaps and Counter-SpeechDOI 10.65701/m6p0z3n8q1
- The Demand for Bullshit Under American and European LawDOI 10.65701/s3x8k1n6r4
- The Landscape of Information Dysfunction: A Visitor’s GuideDOI 10.65701/7r1n6v3k9c
- The Trust Paradox: How Companion AI Is Rewiring Human Connection and Social CohesionDOI 10.65701/c6k1x9r3n0
- Trust By Decentralization? Where Blockchain Systems Meet Responsible AI ChallengesDOI 10.65701/v1c7t4p0z2
- Who Controls the Narrative? The Dual Role of Contributors and Amplifiers in Online ActivismDOI 10.65701/r8z1p3t6c9
- Who Owns the Words? Copyright, AI Prompts, and the Governance of Digital AuthorshipDOI 10.65701/p2d8t1g7q5