Papers & statistics

Selection process

The editorial committee reviewed all submissions received by February 22nd, following rigorous double-blind review standards. The editorial committee was chaired by Dr Hubert Etienne (Quintessence AI) and composed of Prof Brent Mittelstadt (Oxford University), Prof John Basl (Northeastern University), Prof Dominique Lestel (Ecole Normale Supérieure), Dr Jeff Behrends (Harvard University), Prof Marta Cantero Gamito (European University Institute), Prof Marc-Antoine Dilhac (University of Montréal), Prof Rob Reich (Stanford University), Dr Geoff Keeling (Google), Dr Giada Pistilli (Hugging Face) and Prof Chloé Bakalar (Meta & Temple University).

Selected papers

The extended abstracts below were selected to be presented at the conference and the authors were invited to have the full version of their paper published in the conference’s proceedings.

  1. Waging Warfare Against States: The Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Cyber Espionage

    • Wan Rosalili Wan Rosli — School of Law, University of Bradford
  2. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Enforcement Process (e-Enforcement)

    • Neringa Gaubiené — Faculty of Law, Vilnius University
  3. An Ethical Surveillance Framework to Protect People During Religious Pilgrimages

    • Adel Alshehri — Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
    • Abdulaziz AlQabbany — Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
    • Waleed Almutairi — Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
  4. The Prospects of Digital Democracy

    • Ivan Mladenovic — Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
  5. From Opportunity to Effective Agency: How Artificial Intelligence Reshapes Free Choice in Democratic Societies

    • Roberta Fischli — School for Economics and Political Sciences, University of St. Gallen
  6. Responsible AI in practice: Longitudinal study of the operationalisation of AI regulation and ethics in the healthcare sector

    • Vedantha Singh — Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town
  7. AI to renew public employment services

    • Thomas Souverain — Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure-PSL
  8. Democratizing Value Alignment: From Authoritarian to Democratic AI Ethics

    • Linus Huang — Division of Humanities, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
    • Gleb Papyshev — Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
    • James K. Wong — Division of Social Science & Humanities, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  9. Towards Participation as Justice in Generative AI

    • Tomasz Hollanek — Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge
  10. Unmasking Camouflage: Exploring the Challenges of Large Language Models in Deciphering African American English & Online Performativity

    • Shana Kleiner — SAFELab, University of Pennsylvania
    • Jessi Grieser — Department of Linguistics, University of Michigan
    • Shug Miller — SAFELab, University of Pennsylvania
    • Javier Garcia-Perez — SAFELab, University of Pennsylvania
  11. Evolving Social-Relational Norms in the Era of Superintelligent AI

    • Madeline G. Reinecke — Department of Psychiatry & Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
    • Brian D. Earp — Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
    • Andreas Kappes — Department of Psychology, City, University of London
  12. Trustworthy AI and the “Conscious CoPilot”: Navigating our Interactions with artificial agents

    • Jesús Salgado-Criado — Industrial Engineering School, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    • Aïda Elamrani — Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Supérieure-PSL
    • María Celia Fernandez-Aller — Computer Science School, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  13. Technology, Liberty, and Moral Guardrails

    • Kevin Mills — Schwarzman College of Computing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
  14. From Human-System Interaction to Human-System Co-Action: Ethical Assessment of Generative AI and Mutual Theory of Mind

    • Florian Richter — Technical University Ingolstadt of Applied Sciences

Statistics

For this second edition of The Paris Conference, we received contributions from leading institutions in 18 countries. With an acceptance rate of 22%, it tends to be more selective than comparable conferences (e.g., ACM AIES: 38%).

Type of institutions
Universities76%
NGOs15%
Industry6%
Governmental institutions3%
Country distribution
USA26%
UK17%
France11%
Italy8%
Germany6%
Saudi Arabia6%
Hong Kong5%
Spain4%
Netherlands4%
Belgium4%
Other countries9%Canada, Brazil, Switzerland, South Africa, Serbia, Norway, Mexico, Lithuania

Top 10 contributing universities

  1. Harvard University
  2. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  4. Technical University of Munich
  5. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  6. University of Oxford
  7. University of Pennsylvania
  8. Ecole Normale Supérieure – PSL
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. KU Leuven

Top 2 contributing industry actors

  • Holistic AI
  • IBM

Top 2 contributing institutions

  • European Research Council Executive Agency
  • Mexican Supreme Court Justice, Mexico

Top 2 contributing NGOs

  • Ecosistema Formazione Italia
  • Clever Together
↑