Papers & statistics

Selection process

The editorial committee reviewed all submissions received by March 15th, following rigorous double-blind review standards. The editorial committee was chaired by Dr Hubert Etienne (Quintessence AI) and Dr Thomas Souverain (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission) and composed of Prof Joshua Tucker (New York University), Dr Alexei Grinbaum (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission), Prof Aggelos Kiayias (University of Edinburgh), and Dr Herbert Lin (Stanford University).

Selected papers

The extended abstracts below were selected to be presented at the conference and the authors were invited to have the full version of their paper published in the conference’s proceedings.

1. Digital Curtains Descending? Lessons from TikTok v. Garland for Europe

Davide Clementi (University of Macerata and Roma Tre University)

2. The Future of Cyber Capabilities: Emerging Techniques for Digital Influence and Manipulation

Pranjal Saraswat (Central University of Gujarat)

3. The Demand for Bullshit Under American and European Law

Jane Bambauer (University of Florida)

4. Gaming the System: Extremist Strategies in Immersive Virtual Universes

Didier Danet (GEODE Group - Paris 8 University)

5. Binary Selves: How the Digital Paradigm and AI Amplify the Identity Trap and Societal Fragmentation

Élie Chevignard (CEA, Université Paris Saclay)

6. Misinformation, Influence, and Algorithmic Bias: The Role of High-Status Users in Misinformation Spread

Soo Young Bae (University of Massachusetts, Amherst)

David DeFranza (University College Dublin)

7. Building Trust and Developing Value between Creative Rightsholders and GenAI through Tokenised Licensing and Content Authenticity Tools

Chris Elsden (University of Edinburgh)

Caterina Moruzzi (University of Edinburgh)

Burkhard Schafer (University of Edinburgh)

Frances Liddell (University of Edinburgh)

Ella Tallyn (University of Edinburgh)

Evan Morgan (University of Edinburgh)

Billy Dixon (University of Edinburgh)

Kar Balan (University of Surrey)

John Collomosse (University of Surrey)

8. From Black Box to Glass Box: Leveraging Blockchain to Audit AI Systems Through Multistakeholder Participation

Roberto Almeida (Fundação Getulio Vargas)

Lucas Latini (Dublin City University)

9. The Speech Act Gap and Counterspeech

Isaac Taylor (Stockholm University)

10. AI, Digital Democracy, and the crisis of social cohesion: Rebuilding political trust

Adrien Tallent (Sorbonne University)

11. AI as Bureaucratic Decision-Making

Carina Prunkl (Utrecht University; University of Oxford)

12. Guarding the Guardians: A Governance Framework to Detect and Prevent Explainability Manipulation in XAI Systems

Sahaj Vaidya (CivicDataLab)

13. AI with Heart: A Joy-Centered Framework for Ethical AI Development & Implementation

Desmond Patton (University of Pennsylvania)

Shana Kleiner (University of Pennsylvania)

Nicholas Deas (Columbia University)

Jessi Grieser (University of Michigan)

James Shepard (University of Tennessee - Knoxville)

Blake Vente (Columbia University)

Kathleen McKeown (Columbia University)

14. Who Controls the Narrative? The Dual Role of Contributors and Amplifiers in Online Activism

Soo Young Bae (University of Massachusetts, Amherst)

David DeFranza (University College Dublin)

15. Bootstrapping Trust in Web3 from Publicly-Verifiable Internet Data

Yuan Lu (Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Qiang Tang (The University of Sydney)

16. Understanding China’s AI-Generated Content Labelling Mandate: Towards a new mode of Algorithmic Stewardship?

Wenlong Li (Aston University)

17. Who Owns the Words? Copyright, AI Prompts, and the Governance of Digital Authorship

Jaqueline Simas de Oliveira (Fundação Getulio Vargas - Law School - RJ)

18. The Trust Paradox: How Social AI Is Rewiring Human Connection and Social Cohesion

Alva Markelius (University of Cambridge)

Priscila Chaves (Cargill)

Sarah W. Spencer (UK Government)

Joahna Kuiper (HiirAI)

19. A Socioinformatic Analysis of Community-based Fact-Checking: Why Community Notes is not as effective as X claims

Katharina Zweig (RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau)

Julian Pelloth (RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau)

Lena Pölzer (RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau)

20. ​​From disinformation dissection to ideological conflation: leveraging semantic embeddings and stochastic processes for detection of behavioral drifts among content-creators

Clément BENESSE (Opsci.ai)

Statistics

PCAIDE 2025 received contributions from leading institutions in 38 countries. With an acceptance rate of 15%, it tends to be more selective than comparable conferences (e.g., 38% for AIES and 24% for FAccT)

Top 10 contributing universities

1. University of Edinburgh  
2. Fundação Getulio Vargas
3. Harvard University
4. Universitas Airlangga
5. University of Oxford
6. Utrecht University
7. George Washington University
8. Université Bordeaux Montaigne
9. Boston University
10. Carnegie Mellon University

Top 5 contributing organisations

ENIA
Humane Intelligence
UK Governement 
Brazilian Supreme Court
Center for Democracy and Human   Rights Studies

Top 5 contributing companies

Beink Dream
Airbus
Salesforce
Cargill
Hugging Face

Scroll Top